NewsPeace in the time of Duterte?

Peace in the time of Duterte?

-

By Tonyo Cruz
MANILA BULLETIN
December 14, 2019

Pres­i­dent Duterte has made a 180-de­gree turn and called for the re­sump­tion of peace talks be­tween Manila and the Na­tional Demo­cratic Front of the Philip­pines (NDFP).

Com­mu­nist Party of the Philip­pines (CPP) found­ing chair­man Jose Maria Si­son has wel­comed Duterte’s over­tures, sur­pris­ing some in the anti-Duterte united front.

Si­son, who serves as the NDFP ne­go­ti­at­ing panel’s chief po­lit­i­cal con­sul­tant, said in a state­ment that “it is timely for (Manila) and NDFP to cel­e­brate with the Filipino peo­ple the sea­son of Christ­mas and the New Year and to cre­ate the fa­vor­able at­mos­phere for peace ne­go­ti­a­tions.”

Si­son said both Manila and the NDFP can adopt and un­der­take “good­will mea­sures as re­cip­ro­cal uni­lat­eral cease­fires and the re­lease of po­lit­i­cal pris­on­ers who are el­derly and sickly on hu­man­i­tar­ian grounds, es­pe­cially those who shall par­tic­i­pate in the peace ne­go­ti­a­tions.”

Noth­ing is stop­ping both par­ties from again declar­ing a joint or par­al­lel cease­fire this com­ing Christ­mas and New Year hol­i­days.

It is im­por­tant to note for­mal peace ne­go­ti­a­tions stopped in 2017 when Duterte is­sued Procla­ma­tion No. 360 for­mally can­celling the talks. Duterte has also signed on a num­ber of an­ti­com­mu­nist mea­sures which the mil­i­tary has lapped up en­thu­si­as­ti­cally.

A lot has hap­pened since.

Vi­cente Lad­lad, Rey Claro Casam­bre, and other NDFP con­sul­tants have since been ar­rested and de­tained. A dear friend and also an NDFP con­sul­tant Randy Felix Malayao was mur­dered last year, as he slept on­board a bus en route to his na­tive Isabela.

Mil­i­tary of­fi­cials have gone on cam­pus tours to tag le­gal, above­ground pro­gres­sive or­ga­ni­za­tions as “com­mu­nist fronts,” while po­lice forces have un­der­taken raids on the or­ga­ni­za­tions’ of­fices in Ba­colod and in Manila.

Duterte of­fi­cials have also gone on a tax­payer-funded Euro­pean tour to bring their Red-tag­ging and shop­ping sprees in a num­ber of capitals. With­out any fac­tual or ju­di­cial proof, they went on to slan­der and de­fame an al­pha­bet soup of in­ter­na­tional and do­mes­tic or­ga­ni­za­tions.

In be­tween, the mil­i­tary has been parad­ing so-called New Peo­ple’s Army (NPA) “sur­ren­derees” by the hun­dreds, per­haps al­ready out­num­ber­ing its es­ti­mates of the to­tal fight­ing force of the NPA. In­deed, if the “sur­ren­derees” were all gen­uine, there would be no one left in the NPA by now. The “surrenders” could only be un­der­stood in the con­text of the mil­i­tary’s crav­ing for cash and other re­wards from the cor­rupt state.

The NDFP’s readi­ness to talk peace has touched a raw nerve among some anti-com­mu­nist fac­tions of the broad anti-Duterte al­liance, with diehard de­fend­ers of the pre­vi­ous ad­min­is­tra­tion claim­ing that such readi­ness be­trays the com­mu­nists’ sup­port for Duterte.

But it is a mat­ter of pub­lic record that the pre­vi­ous ad­min­is­tra­tion never for­mally talked peace with the NDFP. Or in other words, its of­fi­cials didn’t even pre­tend to pose as peace­mak­ers. Is it the NDFP’s fault that the cur­rent pres­i­dent would of­fer to re­sume such talks?

Since 1992, the NDFP has wel­comed and ac­cepted all of Manila’s in­vi­ta­tions to hold for­mal talks. Not only has the NDFP been al­ways ready with draft agree­ments and good staff work that sur­prise gov­ern­ment ne­go­tia­tors and third-party fa­cil­i­ta­tors, the rebel ne­go­tia­tors ap­par­ently don’t want to give any pres­i­dent the pub­lic-re­la­tions vic­tory about be­ing a peace­maker scorned by com­mu­nists.

The NDFP’s readi­ness to talk peace with Duterte is ad­mirable, be­cause it re­opens a new bat­tle­field to en­gage a regime that has gone in­creas­ingly tyran­ni­cal and pro-oli­garchy. If Manila and the NDFP agree to re­sume where they left off in 2017, the pan­els would soon be tack­ling “so­cial and eco­nomic re­forms,” and then “po­lit­i­cal re­forms.” Or maybe si­mul­ta­ne­ously, if both par­ties would want to.

The talks would give the NDFP and the pub­lic the op­por­tu­nity to chal­lenge Duterte’s re­cent anti-oli­garchy pos­tur­ing against Manila’s wa­ter con­ces­sion­aires. He has openly pre­ferred to turn over the lu­cra­tive busi­ness to an­other oli­garch loyal to the regime.

Work­ers would also be in­ter­ested to know that “Endo,” the pop­u­lar term for con­trac­tu­al­iza­tion, is on the NDFP pro­posal for so­cial and eco­nomic re­forms. The NDFP seeks to bind Manila to an agree­ment that abol­ishes the prac­tice.

The Reds are also ex­pected to raise the plight of Filipino fish­er­folk in the West Philip­pine Sea, and the ex­ploita­tive prac­tices of oli­garchs and big land­lords who profit from the regime’s pro-busi­ness and pro-land­lord poli­cies.

Come to think of it, Si­son is prac­ti­cally in the same po­si­tion as Vice Pres­i­dent Leni Ro­bredo was when Duterte of­fered Ro­bredo to lead the anti-drug ef­forts. Many peo­ple, in­clud­ing many op­po­si­tion lead­ers, warned Ro­bredo against co­op­er­at­ing with Duterte or be­ing an “en­abler.”

Ro­bredo sur­prised both the op­po­si­tion and the regime by ac­cept­ing the pres­i­den­tial ap­point­ment. True, the pres­i­dent dis­missed her af­ter only 18 days, but she emerged the po­lit­i­cal win­ner by call­ing Duterte’s bluff, de­mand­ing an end to ex­tra­ju­di­cial killings, pre­sid­ing over meet­ings, and de­mand­ing in­for­ma­tion on so-called high-value tar­gets.

Si­son and the NDFP chief ne­go­tia­tor Fidel Agcaoili are set to fol­low in Ro­bredo’s foot steps in what could be a last-ditch ef­fort at peace­mak­ing. Both are vet­er­ans of both the peace process and the rev­o­lu­tion­ary move­ment, and they are not about to al­low them­selves to be de­ceived and used.

All eyes are now on Duterte. He has to re­scind Procla­ma­tion 360, or­der the re­lease of de­tained NDFP con­sul­tants and po­lit­i­cal pris­on­ers, and un­der­take other good­will mea­sures. He has to re­strain the mil­i­tary of­fi­cials lust­ing for more war funds and who are nurs­ing the fan­tasy of a mass ar­rest of NDFP, NPA, and CPP lead­ers in their “wet dream” of hav­ing the rebel ne­go­tia­tors agree to hold the talks in Manila un­der the cur­rent po­lit­i­cal cli­mate. Other more cor­rupt el­e­ments want Duterte to stop his “peace talks non­sense” and just give bil­lions more to the gen­er­als to fight a war the mil­i­tary has mis­er­ably failed to win for the past five decades.

Duterte has to choose whether to seek peace or to merely pre­tend. ###

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest news

Bio-data of Jose Maria Sison as public figure

Bio-data of Jose Maria Sison as public figure

Jose Maria Sison talks and meets with Philippine presidents

Jose Maria Sison talks and meets with Philippine presidents

Jose Maria Sison meets and talks with Prime Minister Kyell Magne Bondevik of the Royal Norwegian Government

In the course of GRP-NDFP peace negotiations in Norway , Jose Maria Sison meets and talks with Prime Minister Kyell Magne Bondevik of the Royal Norwegian Government.

Jose Maria Sison receives the Southeast Asia WRITE Award

The literary award is considered the most prestigious in Southeast Asia. The awardees are nominated by national writers' organizations

BOOKS BY PROF. JOSE MARIA SISON, 1961-2022

Since 1961, more than 50 books written by Jose Maria Sison have been published in English, Filipino and other languages. The books listed hereunder chronologically are mostly available from libraries of major Philippine, US and West European universities, Popular Bookstore in Manila and NDFP International Information Office in Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Decision on the petition for proscription against the CPP-NPA as terrorist organizations filed by the DOJ on 21 Feb 2018 with the RTC branch...

The Program of the CPP which is also synonymous with “Plan of Action”, can be construed as the respondent organizations’ “purpose for being,” or the very reasons for its establishment. A perusal of the foregoing Program, consisting of lofty ideals readily shows that the CPP-NPA is organized or exists, not for the purpose engaging in terrorism.

Must read

Bio-data of Jose Maria Sison as public figure

Bio-data of Jose Maria Sison as public figure

Jose Maria Sison talks and meets with Philippine presidents

Jose Maria Sison talks and meets with Philippine presidents

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you