Prolongation of Arroyo Regime Aggravates Crisis of Ruling System
By Prof. Jose Maria Sison
NDFP Chief Political Consultant
July 17, 2005
As in counting votes, Gloria M. Arroyo and her subalterns engage in dagdag bawas (add-subtract) in counting rallyists.
They claim that the anti-Arroyo rally of 30,000 people on July 8 was only 3000 to 10,000 and that of 70,000 to 80,000
on July 13 was only 9000 to 15,000 although some pro-Arroyo journalists concede that it was 40,000 or even 50,000.
The July 13 rally in Makati was even more impressive if we consider that the police and military of the regime blocked
many of the rallyists coming from Central and Southern Luzon.
The officials, police and press operatives of the Arroyo regime go to extremes in belittling the anti-Arroyo mass actions
as well as in exaggerating the number of rallyists on July 16 at Rizal Park. The pro-Arroyo organizers of the rally press
ganged local government employees, teachers and students and deceived them that they were attending a prayer rally.
Despite huge government expenses or gross malversation of public funds, no more than 25,000 were in the rally.
But the police gave absurdly high estimates of the crowd, ranging from 125,000 to 250,000. Two major pro-Arroyo
newspapers also estimated the crowd at 120,000 and 125,000. The seemingly more modest but arithmetically confused
propagandists of Arroyo claim less than 100,000 but boast that the pro-Arroyo rallyists were "twice" the peak of 80,000
rallyists on July 13. The same press drumbeaters of Arroyo during the 2004 electional campaign and vote count are still
serving her faithfully.
The mass movement for the ouster or resignation of Arroyo has grown in size, scope and intensity in the national capital
region and in the provinces since June. Every new peak in the mass actions is preceded by localized build up mass actions
by various mass organizations of the national democratic movement. But her subalterns in the media keep on harping that
the people suffer from protest fatigue and that mass actions are failing to attract enough people to topple the regime.
Subsequently, they spread the brazen lie that the broad united front and the broad masses of the people are giving up
on mass actions and are submitting themselves exclusively to proceedings in Congress or a "truth commission". Arroyo
and her sycophants daydream and boast in pro-Arroyo print and electronic media that they could bring the people's
outrage to a venue in order to squelch it.
The regime is terrified that the broad united front would soon be able to muster at least 500,000 at some focal point
in the national capital region, expose the inability of Arroyo to govern and encourage the military and police forces to
withdraw their support from her. At the same time, the regime is jittery about the fact that the oppositionists in the
House of Representatives are now close to gathering 79 signatures for the Senate to try her for high crimes and for
Noli de Castro to start opposing her .
The Arroyo regime has a definite objective in consistently belittling and mocking at the mass actions of the people
outraged by electoral fraud, corruption, puppetry and human rights violations and in trying to frighten the people
with the malicious claim that communists and Muslims are out to disrupt the mass actions. The rabid loyalists of
the regime in the military and police forces are in fact preparing for the violent suppression of the mass actions.
They anticipate that the anti-Arroyo marches and rallies on July 25 on the occasion of the state of the nation address
(SONA) will be larger than previous ones. Thus, they are now planning to block and assault the prospective rallyists.
But the various forces in the broad united front are now alerted and are adopting the measures to frustrate the regime.
Patriotic military and police officers have assured them that they will openly make a stand and act against the regime if
its loyalists unleash violence against the rallying people.
The Arroyo regime would throw itself posthaste into the abyss if it used violence against the people. It does not have
the resources that were still available to Marcos when he imposed a fascist dictatorship on the country. The suppression
of legal and peaceful but militant mass actions would give justification to a wide range of militant actions for proving the
inability of the regime to govern in the urban areas. Such actions would encourage the rapid spread of tactical offensives
against the local police forces in the rural areas, as in Nepal from 1996 onwards.
The prolongation of the Arroyo regime by any means is nothing but an aggravation of the socio-economic and political
crisis of the ruling system of big compradors and landlords. However, even if impeachment proceedings would induce
Arroyo to resign and enable De Castro to replace Arroyo, he would not be able to last long in power. He would dig
his own political grave by following the same Arroyo policies dictated by the US and the IMF, World Bank and WTO.
The people would reject him as one complicit in electoral fraud, corruption and other high crimes of the Arroyo regime.
The broad masses of the people would not be satisfied with the replacement of one reactionary president by another
through whatever method. They want ultimately to overthrow the rotten ruling system of big compradors and landlords
and to establish a truly new democratic system of the working people and the middle social strata. They wish to bring
about a new Philippines that is independent, democratic, just, progressive, prosperous and peace-loving. They want to
liberate themselves from the clutches of imperialism and reaction.###